https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348450 Delay in completing a new shipper review did not vitiate the anti-dumping proceedings because Rule 22 of the Anti-Dumping Rules prescribes no statutory time limit, provisional assessment had been ordered, and no legal prejudice from the lateness was shown. The claim for new shipper status and an individual dumping margin was also rejected because the applicants had not made full and transparent disclosures about their existence, production facilities, related entities and export arrangements, and the record did not support separate treatment. The anti-dumping findings and consequential notification were sustained. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348450 Delay in completing a new shipper review did not vitiate the anti-dumping proceedings because Rule 22 of the Anti-Dumping Rules prescribes no statutory time limit, provisional assessment had been ordered, and no legal prejudice from the lateness was shown. The claim for new shipper status and an individual dumping margin was also rejected because the applicants had not made full and transparent disclosures about their existence, production facilities, related entities and export arrangements, and the record did not support separate treatment. The anti-dumping findings and consequential notification were sustained. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348450