<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1186 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348429</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the claim of vagueness in the notices and allowing the Revenue to demand duty, penalty, and interest from May 18, 1995, onwards. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the previous orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1186 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348429</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, dismissing the claim of vagueness in the notices and allowing the Revenue to demand duty, penalty, and interest from May 18, 1995, onwards. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the previous orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>