<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1174 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348417</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended warranty charges collected by the manufacturer were optional and not compulsory, thus not includible in the assessable value for duty calculation. The appeal was dismissed based on both substantive and monetary limit grounds, with the Tribunal emphasizing the optional nature of the extended warranty charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1174 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348417</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended warranty charges collected by the manufacturer were optional and not compulsory, thus not includible in the assessable value for duty calculation. The appeal was dismissed based on both substantive and monetary limit grounds, with the Tribunal emphasizing the optional nature of the extended warranty charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>