<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1152 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348395</link>
    <description>The tribunal determined that income from the sale of shares should be treated as capital gains, not business income, as the assessee was deemed an investor, not a trader. The disallowance under Section 14A was deleted since the Assessing Officer failed to verify the correctness of the claim before applying Rule 8D. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1152 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348395</link>
      <description>The tribunal determined that income from the sale of shares should be treated as capital gains, not business income, as the assessee was deemed an investor, not a trader. The disallowance under Section 14A was deleted since the Assessing Officer failed to verify the correctness of the claim before applying Rule 8D. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>