<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9989</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a small-scale industrial undertaking, qualified for the investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The machinery used for printing on tin plates was considered to be engaged in the production of a marketable product. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9989</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a small-scale industrial undertaking, qualified for the investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The machinery used for printing on tin plates was considered to be engaged in the production of a marketable product. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>