https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348371 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I, confirming service tax liability under three categories and imposing penalties under Sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding the time bar issue and quantification of tax liability were rejected due to insufficient discharge of service tax and lack of evidence supporting the application of Section 67(2) to reduce tax liability. The appeal was found to lack merit, leading to its rejection in open court. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:07:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348371 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I, confirming service tax liability under three categories and imposing penalties under Sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's arguments regarding the time bar issue and quantification of tax liability were rejected due to insufficient discharge of service tax and lack of evidence supporting the application of Section 67(2) to reduce tax liability. The appeal was found to lack merit, leading to its rejection in open court. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348371