<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1126 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on an appellant for tax liability on services provided to M/s Kishangarh but remanded the case for re-examination of penalties for services to M/s Giral Lignite. The appellant partially paid the tax liability for services to M/s Kishangarh but delayed full payment without valid reason. The Tribunal directed a fresh decision on the applicability of legal precedent and calculation of the limitation period for services to M/s Giral Lignite, emphasizing the importance of proper assessment in determining the limitation period. Both appeals were allowed for further review based on the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1126 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on an appellant for tax liability on services provided to M/s Kishangarh but remanded the case for re-examination of penalties for services to M/s Giral Lignite. The appellant partially paid the tax liability for services to M/s Kishangarh but delayed full payment without valid reason. The Tribunal directed a fresh decision on the applicability of legal precedent and calculation of the limitation period for services to M/s Giral Lignite, emphasizing the importance of proper assessment in determining the limitation period. Both appeals were allowed for further review based on the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>