https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348361 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in favor of the appellant, ruling that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the demand for clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. The judgment highlighted the lack of reliable evidence, including discrepancies in witness statements and absence of corroborative evidence, leading to the appeal being allowed on 31.08.2017. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:06:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348361 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in favor of the appellant, ruling that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the demand for clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. The judgment highlighted the lack of reliable evidence, including discrepancies in witness statements and absence of corroborative evidence, leading to the appeal being allowed on 31.08.2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348361