<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1117 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348360</link>
    <description>The tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, to Rs. 50,000, finding the original penalty amount excessive as it equaled the duty amount. The appellant&#039;s appeal for a reduction in the penalty was successful based on the tribunal&#039;s discretion in determining the penalty amount, which considered the circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:06:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1117 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348360</link>
      <description>The tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, to Rs. 50,000, finding the original penalty amount excessive as it equaled the duty amount. The appellant&#039;s appeal for a reduction in the penalty was successful based on the tribunal&#039;s discretion in determining the penalty amount, which considered the circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>