<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1115 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348358</link>
    <description>The article explains the distinction between site-mixed Concrete Mix, which may qualify for exemption, and Ready Mix Concrete, which is a distinct dutiable product when specially manufactured with precision and delivered ready for use. It notes that the decisive factors are the nature of the manufacturing process and the characteristics of the finished product, including whether any further treatment is required at the customer&#039;s site. On the facts recorded, the material was insufficient to conclusively classify the product, so the classification and any consequential refund issue were sent back for fresh determination, subject to unjust enrichment principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 07:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1115 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348358</link>
      <description>The article explains the distinction between site-mixed Concrete Mix, which may qualify for exemption, and Ready Mix Concrete, which is a distinct dutiable product when specially manufactured with precision and delivered ready for use. It notes that the decisive factors are the nature of the manufacturing process and the characteristics of the finished product, including whether any further treatment is required at the customer&#039;s site. On the facts recorded, the material was insufficient to conclusively classify the product, so the classification and any consequential refund issue were sent back for fresh determination, subject to unjust enrichment principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>