https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194722 A disciplinary dismissal signed by the Principal and Secretary was treated as valid because the Board's resolutions authorised that officer to take necessary action, including completing the dismissal process. Even if the original authority were imperfect, the Board's later approval operated as ratification, and ratification relates back to the date of the act ratified. On that basis, the plea that the dismissal lacked competent authority failed, and the challenge to the employee's dismissal did not survive. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:49:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194722 A disciplinary dismissal signed by the Principal and Secretary was treated as valid because the Board's resolutions authorised that officer to take necessary action, including completing the dismissal process. Even if the original authority were imperfect, the Board's later approval operated as ratification, and ratification relates back to the date of the act ratified. On that basis, the plea that the dismissal lacked competent authority failed, and the challenge to the employee's dismissal did not survive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194722