<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348345</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the additions and disallowances made by the lower authorities. The tribunal accepted the explanations and reconciliations provided by the assessee regarding unconfirmed credit balances, unsecured loans, and depreciation on assets, finding no revenue impact in the discrepancies. The tribunal concluded that the assessee had properly reconciled the differences, leading to the allowance of the appeal on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348345</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the additions and disallowances made by the lower authorities. The tribunal accepted the explanations and reconciliations provided by the assessee regarding unconfirmed credit balances, unsecured loans, and depreciation on assets, finding no revenue impact in the discrepancies. The tribunal concluded that the assessee had properly reconciled the differences, leading to the allowance of the appeal on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>