<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1090 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348333</link>
    <description>Imported goods under investigation were not ordered to be released outright, but the customs authorities were required to take note of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence report and consider the importer&#039;s application for provisional release. The Court did not decide the merits of the alleged misdeclaration or contravention; it directed the authorities to pass an appropriate order on provisional release within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:39:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1090 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348333</link>
      <description>Imported goods under investigation were not ordered to be released outright, but the customs authorities were required to take note of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence report and consider the importer&#039;s application for provisional release. The Court did not decide the merits of the alleged misdeclaration or contravention; it directed the authorities to pass an appropriate order on provisional release within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>