<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 58 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9979</link>
    <description>In a Chapter XIV-B search assessment, additions cannot be sustained solely on a Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate when the search yields no incriminating material showing undisclosed income or undisclosed investment. The block assessment scheme was treated as a self-contained code, and a valuation report by itself was held insufficient to justify an addition absent search-found evidence of understatement or concealment. The High Court accepted that this position accords with settled law and found no substantial question of law arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 58 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9979</link>
      <description>In a Chapter XIV-B search assessment, additions cannot be sustained solely on a Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate when the search yields no incriminating material showing undisclosed income or undisclosed investment. The block assessment scheme was treated as a self-contained code, and a valuation report by itself was held insufficient to justify an addition absent search-found evidence of understatement or concealment. The High Court accepted that this position accords with settled law and found no substantial question of law arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>