<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1077 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348320</link>
    <description>Admission of an operational creditor&#039;s section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires strict compliance with statutory conditions, including proof of service of the demand notice, filing of the prescribed affidavit, and absence of a pre-existing dispute. The record did not establish service of the section 8 demand notice on the corporate debtor, the required affidavit was not filed, and the claim related to disputes already pending before the Tribunal. As the dispute pre-dated the notice and the mandatory requirements were not satisfied, the application was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1077 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348320</link>
      <description>Admission of an operational creditor&#039;s section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires strict compliance with statutory conditions, including proof of service of the demand notice, filing of the prescribed affidavit, and absence of a pre-existing dispute. The record did not establish service of the section 8 demand notice on the corporate debtor, the required affidavit was not filed, and the claim related to disputes already pending before the Tribunal. As the dispute pre-dated the notice and the mandatory requirements were not satisfied, the application was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>