https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348317 The court considered issues regarding the condonation of delay in filing appeals, the Commissioner's power to condone delays, the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, compliance with pre-deposit conditions, and genuine reasons for delays like illness. Despite the delays, the court decided to condone them, emphasizing the importance of balancing statutory limitations with principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings. The appeals were restored for further consideration on their merits. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:37:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348317 The court considered issues regarding the condonation of delay in filing appeals, the Commissioner's power to condone delays, the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, compliance with pre-deposit conditions, and genuine reasons for delays like illness. Despite the delays, the court decided to condone them, emphasizing the importance of balancing statutory limitations with principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings. The appeals were restored for further consideration on their merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348317