https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348304 The Tribunal set aside the dropped demand and penalties imposed on the respondent and partner by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to discrepancies in the transportation of goods and non-compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for procedural adherence and a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348304 The Tribunal set aside the dropped demand and penalties imposed on the respondent and partner by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to discrepancies in the transportation of goods and non-compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for procedural adherence and a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348304