<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1057 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348300</link>
    <description>Allegations of clandestine clearance based mainly on a rough register and recorded statements were found unsustainable because the record lacked independent corroboration of actual manufacture, removal, transport, or input consumption. The unexplained mark &quot;P&quot; in the register was not shown to represent clandestine clearances, and the defence that it denoted returned goods for reprocessing was not disproved. Discrepancies and double entries further weakened the department&#039;s case. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty failed, and the assessee was held entitled to Small Scale Industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:36:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1057 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348300</link>
      <description>Allegations of clandestine clearance based mainly on a rough register and recorded statements were found unsustainable because the record lacked independent corroboration of actual manufacture, removal, transport, or input consumption. The unexplained mark &quot;P&quot; in the register was not shown to represent clandestine clearances, and the defence that it denoted returned goods for reprocessing was not disproved. Discrepancies and double entries further weakened the department&#039;s case. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty failed, and the assessee was held entitled to Small Scale Industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>