https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348294 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order confirming the demand for availing CENVAT Credit on services like Banking and Financial Service Charges, Mobile Charges, Courier Charges, and Repair and Maintenance Charges. Relying on judicial precedents, including decisions in Cadila Healthcare Ltd and Nash Industries, the Tribunal held that the services qualified as 'Input Services' under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, as they were essential for the manufacturing business. The Appellants' contentions were supported, leading to the appeals being allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:36:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348294 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order confirming the demand for availing CENVAT Credit on services like Banking and Financial Service Charges, Mobile Charges, Courier Charges, and Repair and Maintenance Charges. Relying on judicial precedents, including decisions in Cadila Healthcare Ltd and Nash Industries, the Tribunal held that the services qualified as 'Input Services' under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, as they were essential for the manufacturing business. The Appellants' contentions were supported, leading to the appeals being allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348294