<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1050 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348293</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged the denial of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalty, arguing that the duty paid by the 100% EOU without utilizing a specific notification should be fully admissible as credit. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the full credit of duty paid by the EOU. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1050 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348293</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged the denial of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalty, arguing that the duty paid by the 100% EOU without utilizing a specific notification should be fully admissible as credit. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the full credit of duty paid by the EOU. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>