https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194689 Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in 1999 and 2002, was read to bar any further intra-court appeal where a Single Judge has decided an appeal from an original or appellate decree or order, so no Letters Patent Appeal survives after 1.7.2002. The Court also held that the 2002 amendment does not retrospectively extinguish Letters Patent Appeals already filed before that date, because the repeal and saving framework, together with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, preserves accrued rights unless clearly taken away. Accordingly, pending appeals instituted before 1.7.2002 remain maintainable for consideration on merits. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194689 Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in 1999 and 2002, was read to bar any further intra-court appeal where a Single Judge has decided an appeal from an original or appellate decree or order, so no Letters Patent Appeal survives after 1.7.2002. The Court also held that the 2002 amendment does not retrospectively extinguish Letters Patent Appeals already filed before that date, because the repeal and saving framework, together with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, preserves accrued rights unless clearly taken away. Accordingly, pending appeals instituted before 1.7.2002 remain maintainable for consideration on merits. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194689