<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 832 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate particulars of income for the assessment year 2000-01. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had deleted the penalty based on legal precedents and the admission of the appeal by the High Court involving a substantial question of law. The Tribunal emphasized that a mere disallowance of a claim does not automatically attract a penalty, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 832 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate particulars of income for the assessment year 2000-01. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had deleted the penalty based on legal precedents and the admission of the appeal by the High Court involving a substantial question of law. The Tribunal emphasized that a mere disallowance of a claim does not automatically attract a penalty, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>