https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194681 The Supreme Court remitted the writ petitions to the High Court for fresh adjudication because the earlier decision had not fully examined the disputed statutory expression or the pleaded discrimination challenge. The Court noted that the controversy required reconsideration on the existing materials and in light of the governing levy provisions, and it declined to pronounce on the merits of the substantive challenge. The High Court was directed to dispose of the matter afresh in accordance with law and on merits, with liberty to file additional affidavits and documents. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194681 The Supreme Court remitted the writ petitions to the High Court for fresh adjudication because the earlier decision had not fully examined the disputed statutory expression or the pleaded discrimination challenge. The Court noted that the controversy required reconsideration on the existing materials and in light of the governing levy provisions, and it declined to pronounce on the merits of the substantive challenge. The High Court was directed to dispose of the matter afresh in accordance with law and on merits, with liberty to file additional affidavits and documents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194681