<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1040 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348283</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer order of assessment from DCIT, Circle 2, Ahmedabad to ACIT, Central Circle, Moradabad. It held that the reasons provided for the transfer, related to coordinated investigation in search and seizure cases involving related party transactions within the Genus group, were adequate. The Court found no breach of natural justice, noted compliance with the requirement of agreement between Principal Commissioners, and emphasized the necessity of the transfer for effective administration of the Act despite the petitioner&#039;s objections regarding hardship and inconvenience.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1040 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348283</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer order of assessment from DCIT, Circle 2, Ahmedabad to ACIT, Central Circle, Moradabad. It held that the reasons provided for the transfer, related to coordinated investigation in search and seizure cases involving related party transactions within the Genus group, were adequate. The Court found no breach of natural justice, noted compliance with the requirement of agreement between Principal Commissioners, and emphasized the necessity of the transfer for effective administration of the Act despite the petitioner&#039;s objections regarding hardship and inconvenience.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>