<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1039 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348282</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the initial order and subsequent applications under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, reviving the appeal for fresh consideration by the Tribunal due to unsatisfactory disposal lacking detailed analysis and independent reasoning. Similarly, the Court directed fresh consideration of the appellant&#039;s depreciation claim and the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of legal and factual aspects, leading to the quashing of the initial orders in both instances. The Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law, ordering a fresh consideration uninfluenced by prior decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1039 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348282</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the initial order and subsequent applications under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, reviving the appeal for fresh consideration by the Tribunal due to unsatisfactory disposal lacking detailed analysis and independent reasoning. Similarly, the Court directed fresh consideration of the appellant&#039;s depreciation claim and the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of legal and factual aspects, leading to the quashing of the initial orders in both instances. The Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law, ordering a fresh consideration uninfluenced by prior decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>