<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348281</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the liquidated damages claimed by the assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading, as a legitimate business expense. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue. It emphasized that the damages for breach of contract were part of normal business activities and allowable deductions under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348281</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the liquidated damages claimed by the assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading, as a legitimate business expense. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue. It emphasized that the damages for breach of contract were part of normal business activities and allowable deductions under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>