<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1034 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348277</link>
    <description>The court refused the respondent&#039;s request for recusal, emphasizing judicial independence. The appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law regarding a typographical error. The Criminal Writ Petition was adjourned, stressing judicial conduct principles and judicial power limitations under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1034 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348277</link>
      <description>The court refused the respondent&#039;s request for recusal, emphasizing judicial independence. The appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law regarding a typographical error. The Criminal Writ Petition was adjourned, stressing judicial conduct principles and judicial power limitations under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>