<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1437 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of interest claimed as a cost of acquisition of capital assets for the assessment year 2008-09 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the interest cost incurred on borrowed funds for acquiring the capital asset should be considered part of the cost of acquisition under section 48(ii) of the Act, emphasizing the direct nexus between the interest cost and the capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1437 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of interest claimed as a cost of acquisition of capital assets for the assessment year 2008-09 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the interest cost incurred on borrowed funds for acquiring the capital asset should be considered part of the cost of acquisition under section 48(ii) of the Act, emphasizing the direct nexus between the interest cost and the capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>