<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1023 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment and treating all advertisement and sales promotion expenses as revenue expenditure. It emphasized functional comparability in transfer pricing and that expenses for business promotion should be considered revenue expenditure, particularly when the brand is not owned by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1023 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment and treating all advertisement and sales promotion expenses as revenue expenditure. It emphasized functional comparability in transfer pricing and that expenses for business promotion should be considered revenue expenditure, particularly when the brand is not owned by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>