<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 137 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9963</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the taxability of bank interest on fixed deposits received against a bank guarantee, holding that the entire interest accrued on the fixed deposit was taxable. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of income from the Nainital property, determining it as income from house property, not business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 137 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9963</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the taxability of bank interest on fixed deposits received against a bank guarantee, holding that the entire interest accrued on the fixed deposit was taxable. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of income from the Nainital property, determining it as income from house property, not business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>