<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 74 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the non-levy of surcharge on undisclosed income for a block period before June 1, 2002. The Tribunal determined that the surcharge provision added to the Income-tax Act in 2002 did not apply retroactively to searches conducted before that date. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal concluded that no substantial question of law arose in the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 74 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the non-levy of surcharge on undisclosed income for a block period before June 1, 2002. The Tribunal determined that the surcharge provision added to the Income-tax Act in 2002 did not apply retroactively to searches conducted before that date. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal concluded that no substantial question of law arose in the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>