<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1008 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the appellants under Section 112 (a) &amp;amp; 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 for their involvement in a conspiracy to evade Customs duty through fraudulent import schemes. M/s JVL and M/s ACI Oils orchestrated illegitimate imports, with M/s ACI Oils facilitating the illegal import process by allowing their name to be used in high sea sale agreements to qualify for duty exemptions. The failure of M/s Soma Clearing Agents to disclose irregularities in the import process resulted in their liability for penalties. The appellants&#039; lack of efforts to challenge findings and evidence of their involvement led to the dismissal of appeals and the affirmation of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1008 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the appellants under Section 112 (a) &amp;amp; 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 for their involvement in a conspiracy to evade Customs duty through fraudulent import schemes. M/s JVL and M/s ACI Oils orchestrated illegitimate imports, with M/s ACI Oils facilitating the illegal import process by allowing their name to be used in high sea sale agreements to qualify for duty exemptions. The failure of M/s Soma Clearing Agents to disclose irregularities in the import process resulted in their liability for penalties. The appellants&#039; lack of efforts to challenge findings and evidence of their involvement led to the dismissal of appeals and the affirmation of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>