<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348240</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a judgment delivered by Shri S.S. Garg, Judicial Member on 20/07/2017, allowed the appeal by dropping the penalty under Section 78 and granting the benefit of Section 80 under the Finance Act. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of service tax upon realizing their liability and the absence of evidence showing an intention to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348240</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a judgment delivered by Shri S.S. Garg, Judicial Member on 20/07/2017, allowed the appeal by dropping the penalty under Section 78 and granting the benefit of Section 80 under the Finance Act. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of service tax upon realizing their liability and the absence of evidence showing an intention to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>