https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348233 The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging an order by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The court found that the impugned order adequately considered the arguments and reasons provided for penalties imposed. It emphasized the availability of statutory remedies for correcting errors and held that the writ court should not substitute the findings of the original order. The court concluded that the allegations of perversity were unsubstantiated, and the writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:18:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348233 The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging an order by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The court found that the impugned order adequately considered the arguments and reasons provided for penalties imposed. It emphasized the availability of statutory remedies for correcting errors and held that the writ court should not substitute the findings of the original order. The court concluded that the allegations of perversity were unsubstantiated, and the writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348233