<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 988 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of interest under Section 11AB as the duty demand was raised before the specified date in the Finance Act, 2001. The recovery of interest at the appropriate rate was overturned, and the judgment was pronounced on 25.08.2017 by Shri P. K. Choudhary, Hon&#039;ble Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 988 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of interest under Section 11AB as the duty demand was raised before the specified date in the Finance Act, 2001. The recovery of interest at the appropriate rate was overturned, and the judgment was pronounced on 25.08.2017 by Shri P. K. Choudhary, Hon&#039;ble Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>