https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348227 The tribunal allowed the appeals, permitting the appellant to avail Cenvat credit despite invoices with different addresses. Emphasizing that all services were utilized by the appellant and no evidence of duplication existed, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. Citing previous judgments, it was held that credit could be claimed at any location within the same company without risk of duplication. The impugned order was set aside, and the decision was rendered on 31/07/2017. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:18:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348227 The tribunal allowed the appeals, permitting the appellant to avail Cenvat credit despite invoices with different addresses. Emphasizing that all services were utilized by the appellant and no evidence of duplication existed, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. Citing previous judgments, it was held that credit could be claimed at any location within the same company without risk of duplication. The impugned order was set aside, and the decision was rendered on 31/07/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348227