<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 981 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348224</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake in the Final Order concerning the classification of products, including &quot;Dhanda Dhavana Choornam.&quot; After analyzing contentions and relevant judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal found no omission in addressing the classification issue of &quot;Dhanda Dhavana Choornam&quot; in the final order. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough examination of rectification applications and the need for clear analysis before determining the necessity of rectification, emphasizing the significance of considering arguments from both parties and judicial pronouncements in reaching decisions on rectification matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 981 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348224</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake in the Final Order concerning the classification of products, including &quot;Dhanda Dhavana Choornam.&quot; After analyzing contentions and relevant judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal found no omission in addressing the classification issue of &quot;Dhanda Dhavana Choornam&quot; in the final order. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough examination of rectification applications and the need for clear analysis before determining the necessity of rectification, emphasizing the significance of considering arguments from both parties and judicial pronouncements in reaching decisions on rectification matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>