<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 966 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348209</link>
    <description>The court quashed the reopening of the assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act as the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer were found to be mere conclusions without independent verification, constituting &quot;borrowed satisfaction&quot; from the Investigation Wing&#039;s report. The addition of Rs. 27,54,000 on account of share application money and commission expenditure was also deleted as it lacked independent analysis and verification. The court emphasized the necessity for tangible material linking the information to the belief that income had escaped assessment. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 966 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348209</link>
      <description>The court quashed the reopening of the assessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act as the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer were found to be mere conclusions without independent verification, constituting &quot;borrowed satisfaction&quot; from the Investigation Wing&#039;s report. The addition of Rs. 27,54,000 on account of share application money and commission expenditure was also deleted as it lacked independent analysis and verification. The court emphasized the necessity for tangible material linking the information to the belief that income had escaped assessment. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>