<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 961 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348204</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that the assessee completed construction of a residential house within three years and is entitled to deduction under s.54F despite absence of a completion certificate and non-deposit in a specified bank account under s.54F(4). The tribunal directed the AO to allow deduction of Rs.20,31,839 (Rs.3,50,000 land; Rs.31,839 stamp/registration; Rs.16,50,000 construction). Appeal partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 961 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348204</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that the assessee completed construction of a residential house within three years and is entitled to deduction under s.54F despite absence of a completion certificate and non-deposit in a specified bank account under s.54F(4). The tribunal directed the AO to allow deduction of Rs.20,31,839 (Rs.3,50,000 land; Rs.31,839 stamp/registration; Rs.16,50,000 construction). Appeal partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>