<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Retains Benefit as Main Condition Unbroken; Late Extension Request Doesn&#039;t Deny Re-import Privilege.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36346</link>
    <description>When the main condition of notification has not been violated by the appellant, therefore the benefit of notification cannot be denied merely on the ground that appellant did not seek extension of time within 6 months of re-import</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:58:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Retains Benefit as Main Condition Unbroken; Late Extension Request Doesn&#039;t Deny Re-import Privilege.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36346</link>
      <description>When the main condition of notification has not been violated by the appellant, therefore the benefit of notification cannot be denied merely on the ground that appellant did not seek extension of time within 6 months of re-import</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:58:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>