https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348182 The Tribunal allowed the appeal as the Revenue failed to establish the classification of supervision charges under Business Auxiliary Service. The judgment emphasized the importance of precisely identifying the services for which charges are paid and the necessity for Revenue to provide clear grounds for classifying services under taxable categories to support service tax demands. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348182 The Tribunal allowed the appeal as the Revenue failed to establish the classification of supervision charges under Business Auxiliary Service. The judgment emphasized the importance of precisely identifying the services for which charges are paid and the necessity for Revenue to provide clear grounds for classifying services under taxable categories to support service tax demands. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348182