<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 932 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of copper rods, in an appeal against duty demand on copper ingots and penalty imposition. The Tribunal held that duty could not be demanded on the copper ingots as the appellant was not the manufacturer of the ingots and had not availed any Cenvat credit on them. As a result, the impugned order regarding duty demand and penalty imposition was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 932 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of copper rods, in an appeal against duty demand on copper ingots and penalty imposition. The Tribunal held that duty could not be demanded on the copper ingots as the appellant was not the manufacturer of the ingots and had not availed any Cenvat credit on them. As a result, the impugned order regarding duty demand and penalty imposition was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>