https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348171 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78, confirmed the waiver of penalty under Section 80, and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the Service Tax demands related to the services provided and the construction of the Ash Dyke. The Tribunal classified the scope of work under works contract service and found no liability for Service Tax before the effective date of levy on works contract service. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348171 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78, confirmed the waiver of penalty under Section 80, and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the Service Tax demands related to the services provided and the construction of the Ash Dyke. The Tribunal classified the scope of work under works contract service and found no liability for Service Tax before the effective date of levy on works contract service. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348171