<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 927 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the judgment admitting the application by the Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, despite discrepancies in the debt amount and an incorrect claim. The decision stressed the significance of accurate claims, timely defect correction, and proper authorization in insolvency proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, with each party directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 927 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the judgment admitting the application by the Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, despite discrepancies in the debt amount and an incorrect claim. The decision stressed the significance of accurate claims, timely defect correction, and proper authorization in insolvency proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, with each party directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>