https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348166 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided should be classified under 'Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Service' rather than 'Cargo Handling Service'. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the classification under 'Cargo Handling Service', but upheld the confirmation and appropriation of the service tax amount claimed in error. The decision was made on 21.08.2017. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348166 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided should be classified under 'Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Service' rather than 'Cargo Handling Service'. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the classification under 'Cargo Handling Service', but upheld the confirmation and appropriation of the service tax amount claimed in error. The decision was made on 21.08.2017. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348166