<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 915 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348158</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for a correct quantification of the service tax demand on Commercial or Industrial construction services for the specified period. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate verification and consideration of all relevant details in tax-related disputes to ensure a fair and just resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 915 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348158</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for a correct quantification of the service tax demand on Commercial or Industrial construction services for the specified period. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate verification and consideration of all relevant details in tax-related disputes to ensure a fair and just resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>