<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 911 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348154</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that M/s. Chandra Ispat Limited fraudulently availed Cenvat credit, leading to penalties. However, M/s. Ispat Industries Ltd and M/s. JSW Steel Ltd were cleared of involvement in the fraud and were not liable for penalties under Rule 26. Appeals by individuals involved were dismissed, while those by the companies were allowed. The judgment was pronounced on 27/07/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:57:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 911 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348154</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that M/s. Chandra Ispat Limited fraudulently availed Cenvat credit, leading to penalties. However, M/s. Ispat Industries Ltd and M/s. JSW Steel Ltd were cleared of involvement in the fraud and were not liable for penalties under Rule 26. Appeals by individuals involved were dismissed, while those by the companies were allowed. The judgment was pronounced on 27/07/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>