<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 910 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348153</link>
    <description>Conversion of aluminium or copper wire or DPC into LT/HT coils for transformer repair did not amount to manufacture because the activity did not result in a new and distinct excisable product. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the assessee&#039;s identical activity for a prior period and applied that binding view to the same facts. As the process failed the test of manufacture, no duty liability arose and the duty demands were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 910 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348153</link>
      <description>Conversion of aluminium or copper wire or DPC into LT/HT coils for transformer repair did not amount to manufacture because the activity did not result in a new and distinct excisable product. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the assessee&#039;s identical activity for a prior period and applied that binding view to the same facts. As the process failed the test of manufacture, no duty liability arose and the duty demands were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>