https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194642 A challenge to preventive detention orders was held not barred by an earlier pre-execution dismissal, because the later post-execution petition raised substantive validity on merits. Territorial jurisdiction was established where service and execution of the detention orders occurred within the court's limits. The availability of Advisory Board proceedings did not preclude writ scrutiny. The Court held that withheld complaints, counter-complaints, FIR material, bail order, and related proceedings were vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction; their non-placement showed non-application of mind and was fatal. The detention orders were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, with the detenus ordered released. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:54:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194642 A challenge to preventive detention orders was held not barred by an earlier pre-execution dismissal, because the later post-execution petition raised substantive validity on merits. Territorial jurisdiction was established where service and execution of the detention orders occurred within the court's limits. The availability of Advisory Board proceedings did not preclude writ scrutiny. The Court held that withheld complaints, counter-complaints, FIR material, bail order, and related proceedings were vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction; their non-placement showed non-application of mind and was fatal. The detention orders were therefore unsustainable and were quashed, with the detenus ordered released. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194642