https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194647 A writ petition challenging a District Magistrate's order under the SARFAESI Act was treated as not maintainable because Section 17 provides an efficacious statutory appeal against measures taken under Section 14 after the Section 13(4) stage. The expression "any person" in Section 17 was given wide meaning and was not confined to the borrower, so an affected party could approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. In these circumstances, the High Court would ordinarily decline to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194647 A writ petition challenging a District Magistrate's order under the SARFAESI Act was treated as not maintainable because Section 17 provides an efficacious statutory appeal against measures taken under Section 14 after the Section 13(4) stage. The expression "any person" in Section 17 was given wide meaning and was not confined to the borrower, so an affected party could approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. In these circumstances, the High Court would ordinarily decline to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194647